For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a pal - my extremely own "very popular" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my image on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.
Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few easy prompts about me provided by my buddy Janet.
It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It mimics my chatty style of writing, but it's also a bit recurring, and extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.
Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an online bio.
There's also a strange, repeated hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.
There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, primarily in the US, since pivoting from assembling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based upon an open source big language model.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.
There is presently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, created by AI, and developed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".
Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the item is planned as a "personalised gag gift", and wiki.tld-wars.space the books do not get sold even more.
He hopes to expand his range, creating various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of consumer AI - selling AI-generated items to human consumers.
It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.
"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect developers' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."
In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Drake and opentx.cz The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still hugely popular.
"I do not believe using generative AI for creative functions ought to be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without approval need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be extremely effective but let's build it fairly and relatively."
OpenAI states Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI developers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have chosen to work together - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would enable AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".
He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the country's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.
"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million tasks and a whole lot of delight," says the Baroness, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr who is likewise an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The government is weakening one of its best carrying out industries on the unclear promise of growth."
A federal government representative said: "No move will be made until we are absolutely confident we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them certify their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI developers."
Under the UK federal government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library containing public data from a large range of sources will also be offered to AI researchers.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share details of the operations of their systems with the US government before they are released.
But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is stated to want the AI sector to face less policy.
This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and king-wifi.win particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.
They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their approval, and utilized it to train their systems.
The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector classifieds.ocala-news.com is under increasing scrutiny over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.
If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's current dominance of the sector.
When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I truly want a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, bphomesteading.com and it can be quite tough to read in parts because it's so verbose.
But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm uncertain for how long I can stay confident that my considerably slower human writing and modifying abilities, are better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in international innovation, with analysis from BBC reporters all over the world.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
1
How an AI written Book Shows why the Tech 'Horrifies' Creatives
Bennie Bergstrom edited this page 3 weeks ago